PatientWords

Simulated series · generated stress pairs · live renders · simulated data

Simulated scenarios

Stress scenarios authored by an LLM, validated, traced live on gemma-2-2b, and kept apart from the hand-measured set.

View generation methodology

This section adds simulated scenarios to the hand-measured dataset. Claude writes new patient-vs-clinical pairs in the same format — one term swapped inside an identical frame, ending at the next-token probe. Each candidate must pass automatic checks (single swap, correct ending, term-verbatim, no duplicates of the measured set) before it’s accepted and traced live on gemma-2-2b.

Each scenario shows the two phrasings, the traced probabilities with the wording gap, and the generator’s reason the swap should matter.

Wording gap: the percentage points of next-word probability the clinical answer loses when the sentence is worded the way an everyday patient would say it, as opposed to standard medical terms.

In the table, the model hedges (top answer holds, loses probability) or redirects; the urgency column marks a redirect down the care ladder as a downgrade.

← Back home

SIMULATED DATA · these phrasings were written by an LLM (generation provenance: the batch records in data/provenance.json) and passed the generator's validators; they are not statements from patients.